A- de 1993
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Jaime Sanin Greiffenstein
✓Claimant Pinsky & Asociados S.A.
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Aclaración
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Declaró que no existe un cambio en la jurisprudencia con respecto de la sentencia de la referencia para que la Corte se pronuncie, por tanto, no encuentra méritos suficientes para que el Pleno de la Corporación justifique el pronunciamiento, es decir, que no realizará la aclaración solicitada por el actor por cuanto el texto no da lugar a ningún equívoco.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Primero. Declarar que no existe cambio de jurisprudencia con la sentencia T-120 de la Sala Septima de Revision de la Corte Constitucional.
- Segundo. Abstenerse de enviar a la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional la Sentencia T-120 por no encontrar merito que justifique el pronunciamiento del Pleno de la Corporacion.
- Tercero. No aclarar la sentencia T-120 de la Sala Septima de Revision de la Corte Constitucional, por las razones expuestas en el presente auto.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.